Retrospective: Everything I needed to know about Graduate School, I learned at a conference

Posted: April 29, 2009 in List, meta, School
Tags: , , ,

I’m coming towards the end of my first year in a PhD program. That’s almost entirely accurate. I’ve been in another program that would have eventually resulted in a PhD in philosophy, but since I left with a Master’s degree, it doesn’t count. But now I’m 15 hours into a PhD in rhetoric and scientific and technical communication, with just two papers to write for the remainder of the semester, and then I have a summer to recover/get ahead on my exam readings.

So thinking about that, I figured it would be helpful to go back through the year and think about what I’ve learned. Maybe it’ll be helpful for those not yet in a PhD program, maybe it’ll just be helpful for me a few years down the line when I look back to how naive I was.I started the year thinking I could take three classes and teach one. I’d been taking two and teaching two for years, so I figured it wouldn’t be that hard. Then I discovered three things:

  1. Taking classes is harder than teaching them
  2. There’s more reading in a PhD level class than in a Master’s level class
  3. I took two of the most reading intensive classes in the program at the same time.

What this meant was that I was reading on average 800-1000 pages every week. At first, I even kept up with it, doing everything I needed to do every week. I stopped sleeping. I began to wear down. Already, by October, I wasn’t sure how I was going to do this.

Then I went to a conference. At this conference, I talked to people I knew from my old program. I also talked to people I’d never met before from other programs, and people who finished their PhD’s before I was even born. And from them, and from everyone else I talked to, I got the same message. A message that turned into the most important lesson I’ve learned so far: You can’t read everything. It’s great to try, but it just can’t be done.

That’s not to say that I stopped reading. But I did learn how to skim. And how to barely skim. And how to quickly skim. I learned that sometimes, what I really needed to do was just read enough to know what the piece was about. That way, at a later date when I needed to know something, I would at least know where to look.

That made things manageable.

The second lesson I learned at the CCCC a month or so ago. I was there and talking to various people. It turned out that more or less everyone I ever spoke to already had a PhD. All of them assumed that I did too. They figured that I knew what I was talking about, and seemed to be universally surprised to find out that I was a first year PhD student, that I wasn’t ABD or even a candidate yet.

Why were they surprised? Because for the most part, I could keep up with them in conversation. That told me something I really needed to know: I already know a lot. That sounds almost arrogant, but I think it’s vital for a new PhD student to know. There comes a time, usually in the first semester, when “Imposter Syndrome” kicks in. That’s when you start thinking that you don’t deserve to be there, that any minute now the department will figure that out and kick you to the curb. You start to get paranoid. Every time you have a conversation with someone and they drop a name here and there that you don’t know, you feel like an idiot. You wonder how it is that you even got in to the program in the first place.

Apparently, this syndrome never goes away.

But at the conference, I learned something that helps me fight it back sometimes. I do know some stuff. I can keep up with PhD folk. I DO deserve to be here, and I DO know what I’m talking about. I can drop names too. I can quote things no one has heard of. And my ideas are interesting.

That’s another thing I learned: my ideas are interesting. People want to talk to me about my research. My panel was packed, and I’ve gotten two requests since then for my notes and for bibliographies to point people towards where my research came from. So lesson three also came from a conference.

Lesson four did not come from a conference. But it’s leading up to one, so it still counts. This semester, instead of teaching I agreed to be a research assistant. That led me all over the place, through the fields of pyschology, computer science, rhetoric, philosophy, lexicography, and so on. I learned to follow research back through bibliographies, a skill I’d only dabbled in before. And I learned to find things quickly, and how to organize information. But most of all, I learned that research is fun. I really liked following this research, because I made it my own. It was something I wanted to do, something I was interested in. I found myself finishing other work so that I could do more research. And I found out that all of this research I’m doing is helping to put together ideas that have never really been done before, and will lead to a presentation that I think will be very interesting.

My fifth lesson may result in a conference, or may result in a publication. Etiher way, I’m counting it. I started working on one of those big papers for the semester with a friend from college. A friend in a different department at a different school. We’ve been sending drafts back and forth, each supplying our own expertise, discussing the issue at hand, and really developing what I think is a strong and interesting paper. So what I’ve learned from that is that Collaboration is a very, very good thing. It’s easier than I thought it would be, and much more fruitful.

So, my lessons for the year:

  1. You can’t read everything
  2. You already know a lot
  3. Your ideas are interesting
  4. Research is fun
  5. Collaboration is a very, very good thing.

Not bad for one year.

Comments
  1. Michelle says:

    Now I feel better about starting my Master’s Program. It’s Liberal Arts and Sciences, but it is still a Master’s Program, and I truly don’t feel as though I deserve to be here. Poignant post sir!

  2. Michelle says:

    Maybe I’m not beign the most studious here, but I have a very important question, which will determine my own level of sanity in grad school! What good does it do to assign a peer review of a paper after the paper has been turned in, and due to be turned in on the day of the final exam, which there is none? Am I crazy for feeling as though this is a pointless exercise?????!!

  3. cogitas says:

    So are you asking what the point is of rewriting a paper, and handing in the rewrite at the end of the semester?

    There’s always a point to rewriting, even if you don’t get a chance to change the grade. If nothing else, you get a better paper, which can lead to publication or conference presentation.

  4. Michelle says:

    More like what is the point of doing a peer review as a final project?

  5. cogitas says:

    Because a peer review gives you the thoughts and suggestions of your colleagues, a different perspective that will help you improve your writing.

  6. Michelle says:

    that is totally understood, and yes the comments are helpful, but could have been better utilized earlier in the semester.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s